![]() He did, however, describe the nature of what he saw: "I have to be very careful here. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., to substantiate the crashed UAPs claim, the former intelligence official said he could not divulge specific details, once again claiming the information was too sensitive to share with the public. Grusch said he prefers to use the term "nonhuman" rather than alien or extraterrestrial.Īsked by Rep. intelligence official, told the panel that he is “absolutely” certain that the federal government is in possession of UAPs, citing interviews he said he conducted with 40 witnesses over a four-year period. Here are five of the witnesses' main claims from the hearing: Government is ‘absolutely’ in possession of UAPsĭavid Grusch, a former U.S. The Pentagon has said they have seen no evidence linking UAPs to alien activity, though they have not ruled out that explanation. ![]() These UAP sightings, experts say, might be attributable to balloons, drones, optical illusions or even the blinking lights of a commercial airliner. "UAPs, whatever they may be, may pose a serious threat to our military or civilian aircraft. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the subcommittee, said in his opening statement. “The sheer number of reports, whistleblowers and stories of unidentified anomalous phenomena should raise real questions and warrant investigation and oversight. ![]() Separately, some accused the federal government of endeavoring to conceal key UFO-related information from the public, though they did not provide evidence to support those allegations. Lawmakers on the committee, baffled by some of the testimony, repeatedly noted that UAP sightings are an issue of bipartisan concern and raise national security questions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |